Top Recent

Loading...
profile/5683FB_IMG_16533107021641748.jpg
News_Naija
BREAKING: Jandor Returns To APC
~2.7 mins read
The former governorship candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party in Lagos State, Dr Abdul-Azeez Adediran, popularly known as Jandor, has defected to the All Progressives Congress. Jandor made the announcement on Monday during a press conference at his office in Ikeja, Lagos, weeks after resigning from the PDP. Jandor cited internal crises and lack of party discipline within the PDP as the primary reasons for his departure, expressing disappointment in the party’s inability to address anti-party activities during the 2023 general elections. He said, “Our story in the PDP was a case of working with perennial political saboteurs but we have resolved to love our future much more than we hate our past. “After extensive consultations with family, political associates, elder statesmen, supporters, and well-meaning Lagosians who share our vision for a greater and more prosperous Lagos, and in identifying that the primary reason a political party exists is to win elections and ultimately form the government to contribute to the welfare, security and total development of the people, we wish to formally announce that we have decided to join a political party that considers winning for its members as top priority, not minding who is on the ballot. “We have decided to return to the All Progressives Congress.” Jandor revealed that he consulted widely with political associates, supporters, and leaders across various parties, including the Social Democratic Party, African Democratic Congress, and Young Progressive Party, before deciding to return to the APC. Addressing concerns about his earlier exit from the ruling party, he likened his experience to a Yoruba adage about learning from different situations. “Before you are quick to remind me of the reasons upon which we left APC in the first place, let me respond with a popular Yoruba adage that says if a woman has not tried two husbands, she probably would not know which is better. “In APC, we have a leader, even if you fault his selection choices, you can’t fault his desire to always win for his party to the benefit of all members, followers and the state. “While in Lagos PDP, you have a leader that will, at every election cycle work against his own party, and willfully dash the hopes of many party members and followers. We have chosen the better alternative,” he stated. He added, “Our return to the APC is not a decision made lightly. It is a reflection of our unwavering commitment to the progress of Lagos State and our belief that unity among progressives is essential to achieving the collective aspirations of our people.” He acknowledged the efforts of President Bola Tinubu’s Chief of Staff, Femi Gbajabiamila, and Tinubu’s son, Seyi Tinubu, in persuading him to rejoin the APC. Jandor stated, “Let me once again extend our sincere gratitude to the President and the Commander-In-Chief of the Armed Forces, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, who recognized our modest contributions to democracy and nation building. “I must also recognize the relentless efforts of the Chief of Staff to the President, Rt. Honourable Femi Gbajabiamila, who has been on our case for over one year to return ‘home’, and join hands with Mr. President. “Upon hearing the news of my resignation from the PDP, the President’s son, Mr. Seyi Tinubu immediately put a call across to say “Egbon, this is the time to come back home.” Prior to that time, Seyi had exhibited the learnings he has had from the best and reached out, asking for support for the administration of his father, the President. What more can a father ask for.” Jandor assured his supporters that the move was in Lagos’ best interest and urged them to join him in the new political chapter. “We remain committed to the values of service, integrity, and progress. Together, we will continue to champion the cause of a better Lagos for present and future generations,” he said.
Read more stories like this on punchng.com
profile/8037BFA3DAF6-5B0C-4ED2-A62B-1B33E3540F5D.jpeg.webp
GambiaUpdates
International IDEA, Partners Present Educational Materials To MoBSE
~3.5 mins read

The Presentation Ceremony Held At The MoBSE Conference Room In Banjul, Marks A Key Advancement In Civic And Human Rights Instruction For Upper Basic School Students. The International Institute For Democracy And Electoral Assistance (International IDEA) Is An Intergovernmental Organization That Supports Democracy Worldwide.

At The Presentation Ceremony, Emmanuel Daniel Joof, Chairman National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), Explained That From The Textbooks Creation To This Presentation, They’ve Taken A Crucial Step In Nurturing Civic Responsibility And Human Rights Understanding In Our Schools.
"These Books Will Instill In Our Children Essential Values, Respect For Human Rights, The Rule Of Law, Tolerance, And An Appreciation For Diversity."
Mr. Louis Moses Mendy, Permanent Secretary At MoBSE, Expressed Gratitude To The European Union, NHRC, And International IDEA For Their Invaluable Support In This Vital Area Of Education.
PS Mendy Reaffirmed MoBSE’s Dedication To Equipping Students With Necessary Patriotic Values, Norms, And Respect For Human Rights Through The Ministry’s Civic Education Curriculum.
The Presentation Of These Vital Learning Materials, PS Mendy Noted Is The Result Of In-depth Reviews And Extensive Consultations With Officials From MoBSE’s Curriculum, Research, Evaluation And Development Directorate (CREDD) And Human Rights Experts.
"This Collaborative Approach Ensured The Textbooks Are Comprehensive And Tailored To The Educational Needs Of Gambian Students." He Mentioned.
Also Speaking, Imam Njie, Curriculum Desk Officer For Civic Education At MoBSE, Noted That The Handing Over Of These Textbooks Represents A Significant Leap Forward In Fortifying The Foundation Of Civic Responsibility And Human Rights Awareness Among Upper Basic School Students In The Eight (8) Selected Pilot Schools Nation-wide.
Immaculada Roca I Cortés, The European Union (EU) Ambassador To The Gambia, Acknowledged That Strong Civic Education Empowers Students From An Early Age To Recognize Their Role In Shaping Society And Encourages Them To Uphold The Principles Of Justice, Equality, And The Rule Of Law.
She Indicated That By Embedding These Concepts In The Foundational Years Of Education, Of Citizens Who Are Knowledgeable But Also Committed To Building A More Just, Inclusive, And Resilient Democracy.
"We Appreciate That The Pilot Phase Includes Schools From All Six Educational Regions. This Helps Ensure A Fairer Distribution Of Opportunities And Reflects An Inclusive Approach To Educational Development," She Noted.
She Also Talked About The Gender-sensitive Dimension Of This Initiative, Noting That It Is Important That Civic Education Supports The Equal Participation Of Girls And Boys, Helping To Build A More Balanced And Inclusive Society Over Time.
Ambassador Roca I Cortés, on Behalf Of The EU, Thanked All Those Involved In The Process From Policymakers To Curriculum Developers To The Teachers, Who Will Now Bring This Content To Life In Classrooms Across The Country.

(adsbygoogle = Window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
Continue reading

profile/5170OIG3.jpeg.webp
Healthwatch
How Is Metastatic Prostate Cancer Detected And Treated In Men Over 70?
~5.5 mins read
Questions and answers about the specifics of diagnosing and treating older men whose cancer has metastasized.
A rack of test tubes with different colored caps, with a gloved hand inserting a tube into the rack; in the background, out of focus, the lab tech's face is slightly visible.
National guidelines on prostate cancer screening with the PSA test are set by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). This independent panel of experts in preventive and primary care recommends against screening for prostate cancer in men older than 70.
Why? Prostate cancer tends to be slow-growing. Men in this age group are more likely to die with the disease rather than from it. And in the view of the USPSTF, survival benefits from treating PSA-detected prostate cancer in older men are unlikely to outweigh the harms of treatment.
Still, that leaves open the possibility that men could be screened for prostate cancer only after their disease has advanced to symptomatic stages. For a perspective on PSA screening and advanced prostate cancer treatment in older men, we spoke with Dr. Marc B. Garnick, the Gorman Brothers Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and editor in chief of the Harvard Medical School Guide to Prostate Diseases.
Q. How often should men over the age of 70 be screened for prostate cancer?
Such testing is performed outside of guidelines, and generally following a discussion with the patient’s physician. It's not unusual for us to find advanced metastatic prostate cancer in older men flagged by a PSA test. The disease might spread asymptomatically, but some men get a PSA test only after they have advanced prostate cancer symptoms such as trouble urinating, fatigue, or bone pain.
The USPSTF's PSA screening guidelines are long overdue for an update — they were last published in 2018. And with life expectancy increasing overall for men over 70, we are all anxiously awaiting the new guidelines, which are generally updated every six years.
Q. What sort of other tests follow after a positive result with PSA screening?
Typically, a prostate needle biopsy. And I also recommend a digital rectal exam (DRE) to feel for any abnormalities in the prostate gland. President Biden was having urinary symptoms at the time of his PSA test, and he was reported to have had a nodule noted on his DRE. We do not know what his PSA score was.
Recently, we've been moving toward magnetic resonance imaging scans of the prostate that provide more diagnostic information, and can serve as a guide to more precisely identify abnormalities in the prostate gland that we can sample with a biopsy.
Q. How do we know if the cancer is likely to spread aggressively?
The more aggressive tumors have cells with irregular shapes and sizes that can invade into adjoining tissues. A time-honored measure called the Gleason score grades the two most common cancer cell patterns that pathologists see on a biopsy sample.
That system has now undergone some labelling changes. To simplify matters, doctors developed a five-tier grading system that ranks tumors from Grade Group 1 — the least dangerous — to Grade Group 5, which is the most dangerous. These Grade Groups still correlate with Gleason scores. For instance, a Gleason score of 3+3=6 correlates with Grade Group 1 for low-risk prostate cancer, whereas a Gleason score of 4+5=9 for high-risk disease correlates with Grade Group 5.
We can also evaluate how fast cancer cells are dividing — this measure is called mitotic rate — or order genetic tests that provide additional information. We know that men who test positive for inherited BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations are at risk for more aggressive disease, for instance. BRCA test results also have implications for family members, since the same mutations elevate risks for other inherited cancers including breast cancer and ovarian cancer.
Q. How do you know if the cancer is metastasizing?
Traditionally, patients would get a computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis along with a bone scan. These tests look for metastases in the lymph nodes and bones, but they are increasingly outdated. These days, doctors are more likely to scan for a protein called prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) that can be expressed at high levels on tumor cell surfaces.
A PSMA scan is much better at detecting prostate tumors in the body that are still too small to see with other imaging tests. If the scans show evidence of metastatic spread, we classify men as having either high- or low-volume disease depending on the extent. Men with no more than three to five metastases are described as having oligometastatic prostate cancer.
Q. What treatment options are available for metastatic prostate cancer?
We generally don't begin with a single drug. Men with low-volume metastatic prostate cancer typically get doublet therapy, which is a combination of two drugs that each starve tumors of testosterone, a hormone that prostate cancer needs to grow.
One of the drugs, called leoprolide (Lupron), blocks testosterone production. The other drugs are drawn from a class of medications that prevent testosterone from binding to its cell receptor. Those drugs are called androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs). They include enzalutamide (Xtandi), daralutamide (Nubeqa), apaludamide (Erleada), or another drug with a slightly different mechanism called abiraterone (Zytiga).
If the cancer progresses on doublet therapy, then we can add chemotherapy to the mix. This is called triplet therapy (Lupron + ARPI + chemotherapy). We may also recommend immediate triplet therapy depending upon the extent of the cancer spread.
Some men are eligible for other treatments as well. For instance, men with PSMA-positive disease (meaning their cells express the protein in high amounts) can be treated with an intravenously-delivered therapy called Lutetium-177. Known as a radioligand, this type of therapy seeks out PSMA-expressing cells and kills them with tiny radioactive particles.
Some men are eligible for metastasis-directed therapy (MTD). In such cases, we treat metastatic deposits with highly focused beams of radiation delivered from outside the body. MTD is generally reserved for patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer.
Q. What happens if a patient is positive on a genetic test for prostate cancer?
That opens up options for so-called targeted therapy — which is a term we use to describe treatments that target specific cell changes that cause tumors to grow. Patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, for instance, can start on doublet therapy plus a targeted therapy called a PARP inhibitor. Two PARP inhibitors are approved for prostate cancer in BRCA-positive men: olaparib (Lynparza) and rucaparib (Rubraca). Men with a different gene mutation called microsatellite instability are eligible for a targeted drug called pembrolizumab (Keytruda).
Q. How is the outlook for metastatic prostate cancer changing?
It's improving dramatically! Metastatic prostate cancer used to carry a very poor prognosis. Today, it's not unusual for men to live 10 years or longer with the disease. We're even starting to treat cancer in the prostate directly — something we didn't do in the past since the cancer had already spread beyond the prostate gland. More recent studies have shown improvements from delivering radiation to the prostate gland itself in patients with metastatic cancer. We're including these treatments more often now, which is something we wouldn't have considered before.
Q. Any final notes?
I would advise men to undergo a cardiac evaluation prior to starting on hormonal therapy. Hormonal therapies can exacerbate cardiovascular risk factors, so these should be addressed before and during treatment.
Thanks for your insights!
You're very welcome, glad to help.

dataDp/1032.jpeg
Worldnews
Versions Of Hell: Squid Game And S Koreas Historical Homeless Centres
~11.5 mins read
South Korea’s wildly popular Netflix show has brought renewed focus on the country’s history of brutality towards the poor and homeless. Seon-gam Island, South Korea – Two men stand at the entrance to a forest surrounded by tall pine trees on an island south of the capital Seoul. In the middle of the forest there is a large clearing and an excavation site. The words written on a safety notice reveal what this forest hides: “Seon-gam Academy Graveyard Recovery Operation”. Chun Jong-soo and Pak Sung-ki were just boys when they were among thousands cleared off the streets by South Korean authorities for alleged vagrancy, and held for years as inmates at institutions like Seon-gam Academy. Seon-gam island was only accessible by boat when Chun and Pak were first detained in 1965 and 1980, respectively. Fighting to control his trembling voice, Chun says he remembers the burial site now being excavated here. He was among the young detainees forced to bury the bodies of his fellow inmates who died trying to escape. Chun told Al Jazeera how they would recover bodies that washed up on the island’s shores and bury them at this forest cemetery. “It was meant to show us the consequences of trying to escape,” Chun said. “Memories of seeing those bodies still haunt me in my sleep.” Hundreds and possibly thousands died amid the forced labour, violence and sexual abuse that prevailed in the group homes and detention centres – like the Seon-gam Academy – that were established across South Korea during the country’s decades of heavy-handed rule from the 1960s through to the 1980s. Among the most notorious was “Brothers Home”, a so-called welfare centre that was once located in the southern port city of Busan, where thousands were enslaved and abused in a state-sponsored programme to punish vagrants and clear the homeless from South Korea’s streets. While police did most of the seizures, Brothers Home employees were also allowed to patrol the city in trucks to do the kidnapping themselves. Children, people with disabilities, and the homeless were rounded up, detained and forced to work at the home where survivors recounted witnessing people beaten to death by staff or left to die from injuries. The existence of these brutal institutions in South Korea has come to wider attention as Netflix’s Squid Game gains global attention. Season two of the South Korean drama kicked off late last year by racking up the largest audience ever for the debut of a TV series by the online streaming service. In just three days, the dystopian drama about down-on-their-luck South Koreans playing life-or-death games for a jackpot prize of millions amassed 68 million views. Across social media, the Squid Game hype has been prompted by reports the show was based on the real-life horrors that took place at such places as Brothers Home and Seon-gam Academy. Images purportedly of the Brothers Home have gone viral online, showing eerily similar interiors to the colourful, Escher-esque facility depicted in Squid Game where people compete at children’s games and the losers are killed violently. One Facebook user with more than a million followers shared images of dimly-lit, derelict hallways painted in the TV show’s iconic pink and green. Only later were the photos identified as fakes, generated by AI tools online, according to fact-checking organisations. South Koreans have also criticised comparisons with the TV show, some saying Brothers Home was worse in ways than the fictional island prison of Netflix fame. “Fiction can’t keep up with the horrors of reality,” wrote one South Korean social media user, who said life was “real hell” in the homes compared with that in the TV show game. In 2022, South Korea’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission, an independent investigative body, confirmed that 657 people died at Brothers Home in Busan between 1975 and 1986. Testimonies from survivors of the home recounted horrific conditions that included intense forced labour, physical assault, systemic sexual abuse and pervasive cruel and degrading treatment. “On paper, these facilities were established out of the need to provide relief to impoverished welfare recipients,” said Ha Geum-chul, an investigator for the commission. Hidden was the true function of such centres, Ha said. “Contrary to their stated goals, the forced detention of welfare recipients against their will, human rights abuses, and forced labour in the centres were vastly problematic,” he said. According to Ha, such centres were part of a “unified system of nationwide vagrancy enforcement and detainee management” established by the Ministry of Interior and enforced by police officers who earned “job rating” points for each child apprehended and admitted. “General arrests gave officers up to three points while an admittance to Brothers Home was worth five points. This suggests that police officers performed excessive crackdowns to improve their job performances,” Ha said. Visiting the site of the Seon-gam Academy with Al Jazeera, Chun told how he was captured by authorities while hanging around Seoul’s train station when he was just 11 years old. “I was on my way to my sister’s house when government officials took me in their van. Afterwards, I rode a boat with 40 other captured inmates when we entered the island,” he said. “Every day, we woke up at 6am, assembled in front of the grounds, and worked in the fields all day. They would only give us lunch after we hauled 25kg (55lbs) of rice,” he recounted. “Even then, lunch only consisted of a fistful amount of rice and salted shrimp.” As for what he remembers most about his nine years at the so-called welfare centre, Chun says everyone was beaten daily for the smallest of offences, such as being too chatty. “They just couldn’t bear to let us be kids,” said Chun, who is now 69 years old. “They made us use our excrement as fertiliser and didn’t even care if someone collapsed from heatstroke. That’s why so many of us dreamed to escape this place at all costs,” he said. Inmates would team up in small groups and devise plans to flee. The young boys would practise swimming in a reservoir on the island in the hope of one day making it to the mainland under their own strength across the sea. Many would die trying to undertake the long swim to the shores of Incheon, or the infamous swamps on the island would drown them in their depths before they got very far, Chun said. Chun told how his wife often asked why he still screams in his sleep. “The trauma is something that I will have to carry with me until I die,” he said. Pak Sung-ki’s time at Seon-gam Academy was shorter than other inmates such as Chun. Yet what he faced at the institution traumatised him for life. “Even if I can forget about the punishment I received at the hands of the government workers, being sexually assaulted has left a permanent dent in me,” he said. Before his time at Seon-gam Academy, Pak lived in a middle-class family. Their home had the only television set in his neighbourhood at the time. But his life took a drastic turn when he was picked up at random by government officials while he walked around downtown Seoul as a 15-year-old. Released from Seon-gam after a year and a half when it was shut down in 1982, Pak was never able to return home. His family, like the families of other inmates, did not know what had happened to him. They filed missing person reports at the police station but he was not found. When Pak was eventually released from Seon-gam, he went to his old house but no one was home as his family had moved. It was only when Pak’s family revisited the police one last time to see if they had any news of their lost son – before they moved to the US – that they heard he was in prison. Pak was reunited with his family for the first time in years, but prison walls now separated them. “After I came out [of Seon-gam], I couldn’t work anywhere as I didn’t have any skills. I didn’t have anywhere to go,” Pak said. “So, I lived on the streets and worked as a paperboy and a scrap man just to make enough to buy food. One day, I got caught trying to steal a plate of food from someone. That became my first time entering prison,” he said. Pak’s family moved to the US shortly after he was reunited with them. He could not follow due to his criminal record and they never were able to fully reconnect as a family. They would live separate lives and only communicate through international phone calls. Pak told how he spent time in and out of prison until he was 45 years old. “I’ve frequently visited the psychiatric hospital,” the now 59-year-old told Al Jazeera, revealing he had tried twice to take his own life. “I’ve only recently found happiness,” he added, telling how he had taken up painting in an effort to “give hope to others”. Several of Chun and Pak’s fellow inmates from the academy have not been so lucky – they have simply gone missing and some have also taken their own lives. The remains of Seon-gam Academy’s welfare centre and its associated buildings are still intact on the island. It is one of the few – if not only – welfare centres from that period in South Korea’s history that plans to restore what is left of its dark past and turn it into a site of commemoration for victims and survivors. Gyeonggi provincial authorities are on board to assist the survivors’ committee in their push for more work to be undertaken on the cemetery excavation site. Work is also under way to transfer what is now a temporary Seon-gam museum to a permanent location, and to restore buildings that once served as what Chun and Pak frequently refer to as a “version of hell”. In one corner of the museum are Pak’s paintings of his time at the academy. Painting now serves as a form of mental and emotional therapy, he said, recounting how he learned to draw through YouTube videos and it had opened a new chapter in his life. “I have a dream now. It’s to draw paintings for kids at youth shelters,” he said, explaining how young people in orphanages and other institutions remind him of himself and how he wants to show them to develop their own artistic skills. For Chun, it has only been four years since he first opened up about his experience at the academy to those closest to him. Now he wants that openness reciprocated. If it was South Korea’s regimes of the past that led Chun, Pak and thousands of other young people to be detained against their will, the brief declaration of martial law in December by South Korea’s current and impeached President Yoon Suk-yeol has brought further misfortune for Soen-gam’s survivors. The political turmoil caused by Yoon forced the cancellation of a planned meeting between the island’s survivors, the country’s minister of the interior and safety and the governor of Gyeonggi Province. “We’re angry and frustrated,” said Chun, who serves as the vice president of the Seon-gam Academy survivors committee. “They were supposed to come here and offer a formal apology in front of the survivors,” he said. “Now, we are still waiting for one.” Author of Between Extermination and Regeneration: A Sociology of Brothers Home Workhouse, Park Hae-nam, a professor at Keimyung University, said there are thematic similarities between Squid Game and the institutions established to imprison the socially and economically marginalised in South Korea. If participants in the fictional Squid Game were tools for entertainment, inmates at South Korea’s welfare centres were “tools for labour”, Park said. “Inmates were not in a condition to talk and socialise with each other, and they were not able to become members of society once they came out of the centres,” he said. “And the fact that a lot of people died in these facilities, that’s something that was also shown in Squid Game,” he added. According to Park, the origins of institutions for the homeless goes back to Korea’s liberation from Japanese colonisation in 1945. “As four million displaced Koreans returned from China and Japan, they started to overpopulate areas in the two major cities – Seoul and Busan. With the start of the Korean War a few years later, even more people crowded cities and started to cause daily disturbances. The country just didn’t have the infrastructure to accommodate such a big population,” Park explained. “Newspapers in the 1950s were full of voices that wanted these so-called vagrants taken care of. The government’s answer was to tuck them away somewhere ‘safe’,” he said. With the emergence of Park Chung-hee’s regime in 1963, the Seoul Metropolitan Rehabilitation Centre became the first of these so-called “vagrant asylums”. The military rule would later sign off on ordinance No. 410 in 1975, which gave authorities the power to send people found on the streets to facilities without an arrest warrant. The initiative was carried out under the banner of “purifying the streets”, Park, the sociology professor, said. “Even if their physical bodies survived, people inside Brothers Home were murdered as members of society,” he said. “They were domesticated and made into beasts so they wouldn’t be able to live like humans [afterwards],” he added. Park said such institutions – whether fictional or historical – symbolise how becoming poor in South Korea “could lead one to extreme misery”. Rather than Brothers Home or the Seon-gam Academy, Squid Game creator Hwang Dong-hyuk said he was inspired more by dark Japanese manga such as “Battle Royale” and “Liar Game”. Economic class war also underpins his characters in Squid Game, Hwang has said in interviews. “I wanted to show that any ordinary middle-class person in the world we live in today can fall to the bottom of the economic ladder overnight,” he said in 2021. But when Hwang first floated his Squid Game script in 2008, it was rejected on the grounds the story was considered too violent and too unrealistic to be taken seriously. A decade later, when Hwang circulated his script again, the world had apparently changed and his dystopian scenario no longer seemed so outlandish to the decision-makers at Netflix. “The response that I got after 10 years was that it was, in fact, very realistic – that there are probably people playing this game somewhere in the world,” Hwang told The Hollywood Reporter in 2021. “The fact that this story was no longer not realistic, that it was no longer absurd, but that it was something that was very in touch with reality after a decade, it saddened me a little bit as a person, but it also brought me joy as a creator,” he said. The practice of detention without warrants was ramped up under the military rule of President Chun Doo-hwan, who oversaw South Korea’s preparation to host the 1986 Asian Games and the 1988 Seoul Olympics – including rounding up the homeless and beggars. Local prosecutors, however, found in 1987 that only 10 percent of inmates at Brothers Home were in fact homeless. On paper, the people who were sent to “welfare” facilities should have only been detained for a year, after which they had to be released back into society. But most would not be so fortunate, spending many years toiling and living under brutal conditions. Last year, South Korea’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission released its first comprehensive report into conditions at the welfare centres. In addition to the estimated 3,100 people that were held inside Brothers Home in Busan, the commission found 5,000 people who were known to have been kept inside four other major facilities. But the actual number of such facilities set up across the country and their total population has still to be fully determined. In the case of Seoul Metropolitan Rehabilitation Centre, which was active for over two decades, according to the Truth and Reconciliation Committee, more than a quarter of its estimated 1,900 residents were found to have died while in detention. On Seon-gam Island, the commission undertook a second recovery operation in 2023 at the forest graveyard. The search uncovered 210 human teeth and remnants of 27 items of personal effects. Most of the bodies that were buried in the forest had decayed, leaving little behind. Most were children under the age of 15. And while the official number of bodies recovered so far has come to a total of 24, former inmates such as Chun and Pak believe that figure will climb much higher as excavations continue. “There are even bodies buried in deeper parts of the mountain,” Pak said. “More than 400 bodies may be uncovered by the time excavation efforts are finished,” he said. “Our fellow inmates have been confined in these small graves for more than 50 years. I’m counting down the days until all the bodies are uncovered so I can comfort their souls and pray for them.” Follow Al Jazeera English:...
Read this story on Aljazeera
Loading...