Bluezy13 (speaker 1)

 

Eating out is more cost effective. Additionally, you get to eat varieties. For example, You can use N3,000 to cook a restaurant standard soup minus Eba. Then you keep eating the same soup over and over. But with that N3,000, you can eat rice, okro soup, eat melon, eat bitterleaf soup at different times plus garri in a restaurant or mamaput depending on your location...if we are to assume a plate of food to be N500. You can add extra if you want. Notwithstanding the gas, water, stress and time used to cook that food. And imagine warming a pot of soup over and over for someone without a refrigerator or electricity let alone the cost of fuel and maintenance of generator if inclusive. But if two or more persons are involved, cooking is preferable. It is worthy of note that the criterion for judgement here is relating eating out to cooking considering a particular amount of money.

Eating out is more cost effective.

 

Additionally, you get to eat varieties.

 

For example,

You can use N3,000 to cook a restaurant standard soup minus Eba. Then you keep eating the same soup over and over.

But with that N3,000, you can eat rice, okro soup, eat melon, eat bitterleaf soup at different times plus garri in a restaurant or mamaput depending on your location...if we are to assume a plate of food to be N500. You can add extra if you want.

 

Notwithstanding the gas, water, stress and time used to cook that food. And imagine warming a pot of soup over and over for someone without a refrigerator or electricity let alone the cost of fuel and maintenance of generator if inclusive.

 

But if two or more persons are involved, cooking is preferable.

 

It is worthy of note that the criterion for judgement here is relating eating out to cooking considering a particular amount of money.

 

 

Re:

Deepocean (speaker 2)

 

No matter how, cooking will always be cost effective. For you to eat satisfactorily in any mama put these days, you will have at least 1,000 Let say you want to eat 1,000 food in the morning, eat snacks of 300 in the afternoon and another 1,000 meal as dinner. This will amount to 16,100 in a week and 69,000 in a month of 30 days. Now, if you use 69,000 to get raw food. Analysis: If you look out to fill your gas from the seller selling in bulk you will fill at an average of 700/kg. You will fill 12.5kg cylinder with 9,000 transport included. Out of 69,000. 1 12.5kg gas +transport fare = 9,000 1. ½ bag of rice = 15,000 2 Bean = 5,000 3. Semi 10kg = 6,000 4. Garri = 3,000 5. Yam = 5000 Ingredients for cooking soup eg: Palm oil, seasoning and others =5,000 Balance = 26,000 Out of the remaining 26,000 Budget 4,000 for soup and the transport fare to buy the ingredients every week. Remaining 6,000 can be kept for miscellaneous and evening suya and Pepsi while returning from work. (Quote) (Report) 73 Likes (Like) 6 Shares (Share)

No matter how, cooking will always be cost effective.

 

For you to eat satisfactorily in any mama put these days, you will have at least 1,000

 

Let say you want to eat 1,000 food in the morning, eat snacks of 300 in the afternoon and another 1,000 meal as dinner.

 

This will amount to 16,100 in a week and 69,000 in a month of 30 days.

 

Now, if you use 69,000 to get raw food.

 

Analysis: If you look out to fill your gas from the seller selling in bulk you will fill at an average of 700/kg. You will fill 12.5kg cylinder with 9,000 transport included.

 

Out of 69,000.

 

1 12.5kg gas +transport fare = 9,000

 

1. ½ bag of rice = 15,000

 

2 Bean = 5,000

 

3. Semi 10kg = 6,000

 

4. Garri = 3,000

 

5. Yam = 5000

 

Ingredients for cooking soup eg: Palm oil, seasoning and others =5,000

 

Balance = 26,000

 

Out of the remaining 26,000

Budget 4,000 for soup and the transport fare to buy the ingredients every week.

 

Remaining 6,000 can be kept for miscellaneous and evening suya and Pepsi while returning from work.

Note: This post was disabled from earning until this user properly edits this post >>

What's the most insane thing a human has survived?

Mine goes to Harrison Okene. He was a Nigerian sailor/chef, when a tugboat he was on sank. Divers went searching THREE days after the boat sank, only then they found a survivor. He was in a small air pocket 100 feet under the surface. Never could I imagine a man being trapped a 100 feet under the surface for 3 days, and surviving.

Once he was found, divers were nervous he would panic during the rescue. He had been breathing dangerous levels of nitrogen, and had never used scuba equipment. Harrison thought it had only been 12–14 hours before he found out he had been buried under the sea for 60 hours. Once resurfacing, Harrison was reunited with his family and now has vowed to “never return to the sea.” check for a link to the original video of the rescue: 

What scientific photos are hard to believe but are indeed real? Rescued After 60 Hours.